At 9 a.m. on both the original defendant dragged the big suitcase full of thick materials, once again went into the Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court, to participate in the case of the second trial.
different with the first hearing, the defendants in this trial, additional to three. As the number of defendants appear in court more, the third defendant's attorney, Rand Corporation, Austria had to pull a chair and sit on the dock side.
previous hearing both sides refused to mediate, what is surprising is changed to this court Both sides expressed willingness to mediate, that the other party has a good program. Judge said in court after court will preside over the mediation.
Search Dog "QQ" "cross bite"
2009 years, Sohu's Sogou the two companies accused of Tencent QQ Pinyin input method provided unfair competition, the Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Ltd. and to provide for the Tencent QQ Pinyin download service Information Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing Olympic Grand lawsuit, claims 20 million yuan. In the same year on November 16, the Beijing Intermediate People's Court held hearings on the second case.
Interestingly, Tencent technology companies in Beijing, one in the hospital then sued decree Sogou Pinyin input method to stop unfair competition, and also claims 20 million yuan. It is reported that the case is now in hospital in a public hearing once, will soon be a second trial.
trial twists and turns
"as related to the plaintiff's trade secrets, our oral application is not open to examine the case." Trial has just begun, the defendant companies Tencent, Tencent Computer agent lawyer Guo Jincheng really surprises.
Guo Jin Cheng went on to explain that the plaintiff in a proposed trial in the House of his previous attorney had done the plaintiff, the plaintiff acquired a large number of trade secrets. That being the case, the case heard in public is appropriate.
plaintiffs attorney Jing Chuan said in a clear disagree. He believes that the case has been a public hearing, while the two input software and enterprise unfair competition does not involve trade secrets.
The Tribunal concluded that, as the case may involve the plaintiff's trade secrets, but the plaintiff did not apply, therefore not be considered.
"We decided to change lawyers, and lawyers and Li Jincheng, published before the agency views, opinions re-examine cross-examination, ask the court to give us some time after the re-trial." Agent of the defendant's other two then You Xiang Court of the replacement of an agent.
"The defendant is to delay this time." Plaintiffs attorney firmly opposed to adjournment.
recess for 15 minutes, the full court by the council, said, Tencent Technologies, Tencent computer companies have other agents appear to express a preliminary view that today's trial will continue. The court will give the defendant time to Guo Jincheng, deputy counsel to review the advice before, if there are objections, the court will organize further exchange of views.
heated debate "three counts"
the court, the plaintiff cited two Tencent malicious interference with the user's "three counts": false propaganda, maliciously prevent, intervene in order. As is already the second trial, the two sides revolves around three main focus to start an in-depth debate.
plaintiff pointed out, QQ Pinyin input method is installed, it will remind users not to check the other input method, otherwise it will cause the computer to run slowly. Moreover, the users to download, use QQ Pinyin input method software at the same time, the software using its destructive technology to directly remove the user terminal Sogou Pinyin Input Method Shortcut objectively prevents network users to use the plaintiff's Sogou Pinyin Input method software.
No comments:
Post a Comment